Priority areas for applying artificial intelligence to pedagogical education

Oʻzbekcha

SUN’IY INTELLEKT VOSITALARI ASOSIDA TALABALARNING KASBIY TAFAKKURINI RIVOJLANTIRISH TEXNOLOGIYALARI

Published
25.04.2026
Journal
Priority areas for applying artificial intelligence to pedagogical education
Issue
Priority areas for applying artificial intelligence to pedagogical education
Pages
260-265
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19828868

Authors

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada ChatGPT, Khanmigo va Socratic kabi sun’iy intellekt vositalarining oliy pedagogik ta’limda talabalar kasbiy tafakkurini rivojlantirishdagi pedagogik imkoniyatlari tahlil qilinadi. Sun’iy intellekt ta’lim texnologiyalarining muassasaga, talabaga va o‘qituvchiga yo‘naltirilgan uch yo‘nalishi ko‘rib chiqilib, pedagogik muvozanat tamoyili asoslanadi

Keywords

ChatGPT raqamli ta’lim sun’iy intellekt tanqidiy fikrlash ta’lim texnologiyalari kasbiy tafakkur pedagogik muvozanat oliy pedagogik ta’lim kognitiv faollik kompetensiyaviy yondashuv

Other language versions

Русский
В данной статье анализируются педагогические возможности инструментов искусственного интеллекта, таких как ChatGPT, Khanmigo и Socratic, в развитии профессионального мышления студентов в системе высшего педагогического образования. Рассматриваются три направления образовательных технологий искусственного интеллекта, ориентированных на учреждение, студента и преподавателя, и обосновывается принцип педагогического баланса
ChatGPT критическое мышление образовательные технологии цифровое образование Искусственный интеллект профессиональное мышление педагогический баланс высшее педагогическое образование когнитивная активность компетентностный подход
English
This article analyzes the pedagogical potential of artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT, Khanmigo, and Socratic in developing students' professional thinking in higher pedagogical education. Three directions of AI educational technologies — institution-oriented, student-oriented, and teacher-oriented – are examined, and the principle of pedagogical balance is substantiated
ChatGPT critical thinking digital education educational technologies Artificial intelligence professional thinking pedagogical balance higher pedagogical education cognitive activity competency-based approach

References

1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining "Sun'iy intellekt texnologiyalarini 2030-yilga qadar rivojlantirish strategiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida"gi Qarori. PQ-358-son, 2024-yil 14-oktabr. — Toshkent: O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Qonun hujjatlari ma'lumotlar bazasi. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-7158604
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
4. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
5. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
6. Ng, A. (2017, January 25). Artificial Intelligence is the New Electricity. Stanford Graduate School of Business MSx Future Forum.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/andrew-ng-why-ai-new-electricity
7. Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532
8. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
View PDF Related articles